Compare · as of September 30, 2026

The leading ways to build with AI agents. Which one is yours?

Each of these methods is good at what it sets out to do. Here is what each one believes, who it suits, and where the Enso Method chose differently.

This guide is written by EnsoDynamics, which makes the Enso Method. We compare our method with others as fairly as we can, and we recommend another method when it fits you better.

Where each method sits

How far ahead each method plans, and how much it runs on its own. Positions are our reading of each method’s own skills and documentation; close neighbours are nudged apart so each one shows.

PLAN IT ALL, STEER IT YOURSELF PLAN IT ALL, LET IT RUN ONE CHANGE, HANDS ON ONE CHANGE, HANDS OFF One change at a time The whole body of work up front ← You steer each step It runs on its own → Superpowers agent-skills Matt Pocock’s skills GSD Compound Engineering BMAD Method AWS AI-DLC HumanLayer QRSPI GitHub Spec Kit OpenSpec gstack The Enso Method
  1. Superpowers: planning toward “One change at a time”; steering toward “It runs on its own”
  2. agent-skills: planning toward “One change at a time”; steering toward “You steer each step”
  3. Matt Pocock’s skills: planning toward “One change at a time”; steering toward “You steer each step”
  4. GSD: planning at the “The whole body of work up front” end; steering toward “It runs on its own”
  5. Compound Engineering: planning at the “One change at a time” end; steering toward “It runs on its own”
  6. BMAD Method: planning toward “The whole body of work up front”; steering in the middle
  7. AWS AI-DLC: planning toward “The whole body of work up front”; steering at the “You steer each step” end
  8. HumanLayer QRSPI: planning at the “One change at a time” end; steering toward “You steer each step”
  9. GitHub Spec Kit: planning toward “One change at a time”; steering toward “You steer each step”
  10. OpenSpec: planning at the “One change at a time” end; steering toward “You steer each step”
  11. gstack: planning at the “One change at a time” end; steering in the middle
  12. The Enso Method: planning at the “The whole body of work up front” end; steering at the “It runs on its own” end

Hands-off builds

You agree a plan, then the agent builds alone, often for hours. The rigor is in the build itself: test-first rules, a fresh reviewer per task, QA in a real browser.

Hands-on at every step

You make each call and review the work as it goes, step by step.

Spec-driven

The spec is the main deliverable, written to a set format, such as numbered requirements or WHEN/THEN scenarios, and reviewed before any code. The rigor is in the spec; the build follows it.

Whole-project planning

Plan the entire product first, as a roadmap or a lifecycle, then build it stage by stage.